India’s Bankruptcy Law Reinforced by Supreme Court Judgment
By Srinivas Raman
India’s Supreme Court (SC) recently delivered its first detailed judgment pertaining to the interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The most important takeaway from the SC judgment was its implications for the implementation of bankruptcy regulation in the country.
The Court clarified that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (henceforth, Code) will supersede all other insolvency related laws in existence.
Additionally, the judgment highlights the importance of compliance with key provisions of the Code.
Key features of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
The purpose of the Code is to consolidate multiple insolvency laws into one single statute, and to ensure time-bound resolution process to maximize debt recovery.
Some of the key aspects under the Code are as follows:
- Financial thresholds for default: In order to initiate proceedings under the Code, corporate debtors must have defaulted by at least US$1,495 (Rs 100,000). In case of individuals and unlimited partnerships, the threshold is US$15 (Rs 1,000).
- Two stage resolution process: This allows creditors to determine the financial viability of the debtor, and decide whether to revive the business or opt for liquidation.
- Priority of claims after liquidation: After paying the administrative costs, the Code lays down a priority structure for recovery of debts. Accordingly, the secured creditors and workmen’s dues during the past 24 months are the first priority. They are followed by unsecured creditors, and federal and local government dues.
- Institutional framework: The Code establishes an institutional framework comprising of a regulator, insolvency resolution professionals (IRP), information utilities, and a dispute resolution mechanism in order to enable speedy resolution and liquidation process.
Insolvency Code overrides all other bankruptcy laws in India
One of the major roadblocks hindering the implementation of the Code was the co-existence of multiple federal and state laws governing insolvency and liquidation.
Since the inception of the Code, defaulting parties often sought to stall recovery proceedings under the Code by claiming recourse to the provisions of other laws on the subject.
This strategy resulted in delaying the time-bound resolution process under the Code, thereby reducing debt recovery ratios.
Against this backdrop, the SC has categorically held that the Code shall have an overriding effect over all other conflicting legislations.
In this regard, the Court also reiterated that in case of conflict between the provisions of a state law and a federal law, the latter shall prevail over the former.
Powers of insolvency resolution professionals in India
The Court also ruled that as per the Code, once an IRP has been appointed, the defaulting company’s management shall have no role to play in the resolution process.
This is because the IRP will be vested with all the rights to manage the insolvency resolution process in order to ensure maximum debt recovery.
Therefore, the former directors of the defaulting company cannot challenge the decisions of the IRP in this regard.
Bankruptcy reform in India – Impact on doing business
The implementation of the Code significantly reforms India’s distressed credit situation by reducing systemic inefficiencies prevalent under the erstwhile regime.
The Code empowers creditors to make an early assessment of the situation, and take commercially prudent decisions to maximize debt recovery ratios.
Country Manager Rohit Kapur of Dezan Shira & Associates observes that “the SC’s judgment is a positive signal as it recognizes the importance of compliance with the Code to strengthen India’s debt markets, and improve ease of doing business in India. Financial institutions and corporate debtors are strongly urged to adhere to the provisions of the Code and not seek recourse under any other insolvency law”.
India Briefing is published by Asia Briefing, a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. We produce material for foreign investors throughout Eurasia, including ASEAN, China, Indonesia, Russia, the Silk Road, & Vietnam. For editorial matters please contact us here and for a complimentary subscription to our products, please click here.
Dezan Shira & Associates provide business intelligence, due diligence, legal, tax and advisory services throughout India and the Asian region. We maintain offices in Delhi and Mumbai and throughout China, South-East Asia, India, and Russia. For assistance with India investment issues or into Asia overall, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org or visit us at www.dezshira.com.
Dezan Shira & Associates is a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm, providing legal, tax and operational advisory to international corporate investors. Operational throughout China, ASEAN and India, our mission is to guide foreign companies through Asia’s complex regulatory environment and assist them with all aspects of establishing, maintaining and growing their business operations in the region. This brochure provides an overview of the services and expertise Dezan Shira & Associates can provide.
The third edition of Tax, Accounting and Audit in India is updated for 2017, and provides an overview of the fundamentals of India’s tax, accounting, and audit regime. The guide also includes a detailed introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) that was launched on July 1, 2017, representing the complete transformation of India’s indirect taxation structure.
In this issue of India Briefing Magazine, we discuss payroll processing and reporting in India, and the various regulations and tax norms that impact salary and wage computation. Further, we explain India’s complex social security system and gratuity law, and how it applies to companies. Finally, we describe the importance of IT infrastructure, compliance, and confidentiality when processing payroll in India.
- Previous Article AI and Automation Processes in India’s Economy
- Next Article Exporters in India Suffer under GST Regime – Delays in Refund Processing, Malfunctioning System