Special Valuation Branch Compliance in India: Customs and Transfer Pricing Review

Importers must align customs valuation, transfer pricing, and intercompany documentation to strengthen India Special Valuation Branch (SVB) compliance and mitigate regulatory exposure.

Find Business Support

Reach Our Experts for Special Valuation Branch and Customs Support

For multinational companies importing goods into India from parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries, or other group entities, Special Valuation Branch (SVB) compliance is no longer just a customs filing exercise. It is now a broader risk area involving customs valuation, HSN classification, transfer pricing, intercompany agreements, and post-clearance audit readiness.

India’s SVB framework is governed by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) procedures for reviewing related-party import transactions, including cases involving royalties, license fees, technical fees, and other payments that may affect the customs value of imported goods.

The practical compliance environment has become more demanding. Faster cargo clearance, risk-based customs controls, post-clearance audits, and more detailed transfer pricing reporting mean that importers must ensure their customs, tax, and intercompany documentation are aligned before questions arise.

For multinational companies with Indian subsidiaries, a key question is: Can the company defend its import pricing, HSN classification, intercompany agreements, and transfer pricing position as one consistent story?

Why are Special Valuation Branch reviews commercially significant?

Find Business Support

Learn more about customs and trade regulatory requirements before you start importing

A Special Valuation Branch review may apply when an Indian importer purchases goods from a related foreign supplier. Indian customs authorities examine whether the relationship between the parties has influenced the declared transaction value and, consequently, the customs duty paid.

SVB compliance is commercially significant because customs and transfer pricing authorities may examine the same related-party transaction from different perspectives:

• Customs authorities assess whether the import value has been understated, resulting in lower customs duty.
• Income tax authorities apply transfer pricing rules to determine whether import prices and related-party payments have reduced taxable profits in India.

This creates a dual-compliance challenge for multinational companies importing goods into India. Customs valuation, transfer pricing documentation, intercompany agreements, product classification, and post-clearance records must support a consistent commercial position.

Completing an SVB review does not eliminate wider import compliance risks. An importer may have an approved SVB valuation but outdated intercompany agreements, a robust transfer pricing study but insufficient customs valuation evidence, or commercially supportable pricing paired with an incorrect HSN classification.

A coordinated customs and transfer pricing readiness review can identify these inconsistencies before they lead to duty demands, tax adjustments, penalties, or supply-chain disruption.

How does Form 48 affect SVB and transfer pricing compliance?

India’s updated income-tax reporting framework has introduced a more structured approach to transfer pricing documentation. Form 48 replaces the former Form 3CEB as the accountant’s report for international transactions and specified domestic transactions under the Income-tax Act, 2025, and Income Tax Rules, 2026.

For importers, this increases the importance of consistency across customs and tax filings. Form 48 may capture transaction-wise details on associated enterprises, pricing methods, arm’s length price determination, margins, comparables, and adjustments.

Transfer pricing documentation does not replace the evidence required to support customs valuation. However, inconsistencies between Form 48, SVB submissions, customs declarations, intercompany agreements, and financial statements may attract regulatory scrutiny and weaken the importer’s stated valuation position.

Importers should therefore review SVB positions before finalizing annual transfer pricing documentation, implementing year-end pricing adjustments, or introducing new intercompany charges.

Common triggers for Special Valuation Branch review

Companies should reassess their SVB position when there is a material change in related-party import arrangements.

These changes may affect the original basis on which the SVB position was reviewed. Importers should not wait for a customs query to identify these issues.

A proactive SVB readiness review can help determine whether additional disclosures, revised documentation, or valuation support may be required.

ALSO READ: Import-Export Procedures in India: 2026 Edition

Why HSN classification should come first

HSN classification is often treated as a separate compliance issue, but it is central to SVB readiness. Incorrect classification can affect duty rates, exemption eligibility, documentation, valuation review, and the level of customs scrutiny.

Find Business Support

We support foreign businesses with customs advisory, trade compliance reviews, SVB procedures, and market entry planning

For importers with large product portfolios, especially in sectors such as medical devices, electronics, machinery, automotive components, chemicals, and industrial equipment, HSN classification should be reviewed before preparing the SVB application. This helps ensure that the product description, technical specifications, import documents, and valuation methodology are aligned from the start.

Intercompany agreements need customs review

Find Business Support

Get support for related-party import compliance in India

Intercompany agreements are often drafted for legal, tax, or group policy purposes. However, customs authorities may examine whether payments under these agreements should be added to the assessable value of imported goods.

Clauses relating to royalties and license fees and trademark or brand use should be reviewed carefully.

If these payments are linked to imported goods, customs authorities may examine whether they should form part of the customs value. This is why SVB compliance should involve customs, tax, legal, finance, and supply chain teams – not only the customs broker.

Special Valuation Branch: Practical advisory for India-based importers

Companies preparing an SVB application or reviewing an existing related-party import structure can benefit from a phased approach.

Indicative timelines depend on the size of the product portfolio, document readiness, transaction complexity, and authority processing. HSN classification and SVB application preparation may each require several working weeks once complete documents are available. The filing and closure phase is authority-dependent and may take several months.

SVB readiness checklist for importers

Before filing or updating an SVB position, companies should ask:

How Dezan Shira & Associates can assist

SVB compliance should be managed as a coordinated customs and transfer pricing exercise. Dezan Shira & Associates assists foreign companies in India with end-to-end SVB readiness, including:

• HSN classification review;
• SVB applicability assessment;
• Transaction structure and customs valuation review;
• Preparation of Annexure A and SVB questionnaire responses;
• Review of intercompany agreements;
• Royalty, license fee, and service fee analysis;
• Transfer pricing study and benchmarking support;
• Reconciliation of SVB filings with Form 48 disclosures;
• SVB filing and authority liaison;
• Query response and additional submission support; and
• Post-clearance audit readiness.

For multinational importers, the commercial objective is clear: avoid customs disruption, reduce valuation exposure, and ensure that import pricing, transfer pricing, and intercompany documentation remain defensible.

Companies importing from related parties should consider an SVB readiness review before introducing new intercompany agreements, making year-end transfer pricing adjustments, filing Form 48, expanding product lines, or importing from new group suppliers.

• Previous Article How India’s Competition Law Regulates Bid Rigging: Lessons from the HP India Case
• Next Article