Legal & Regulatory

A Guide to India’s Transfer Pricing Law and Practice – Part 1

Posted on by

By Shilpa Goel – Business Advisory Associate, Dezan Shira & Associates 

India enacted transfer pricing rules in 2001, which require companies to conclude international transactions with associated enterprises at an arm’s length. The legislation is primarily targeted at large business groups who engage in base erosion and profit shifting to avoid paying corporate income tax in India. This article is the first of two that will provide an insight into some of the key compliance issues that surround India’s transfer pricing regime, which has, since its enactment in 2001, evolved and acquired new shapes.

The key transfer pricing legislation in India is contained in Chapter X of the Income Tax Act (IT Act), 1961. In addition, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issues circulars and notifications as well as specific guidance known as Taxpayer Information Series, which, together with rulings of tax tribunals and courts, comprise Indian transfer pricing rules. These are given effect to by specialists working under the CBDT’s supervision, including the Directorate of International Taxation and Transfer Pricing, Transfer Pricing Officers (TPO), and Assessing Officers (AO).

In interpreting domestic transfer pricing rules, courts in India rely on guidance published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, such as commentaries on specific transfer pricing provisions contained in model double tax avoidance conventions and the transfer pricing guidelines for multinational enterprises and tax administration. However, the domestic legislative framework takes precedence over the OECD guidance.

Concept of “arm’s length price”, “international transaction” and “associated enterprises”

Section 92 of the IT Act requires international or specified domestic transactions carried out between associated enterprises to reflect arm’s length pricing – that is, the price that would have been paid if such transactions were made between independent third parties at general market value.

For the purpose of the IT Act, “international transaction” means a transaction between two or more associated enterprises and includes purchase, sale or lease of tangible or intangible property, provision of services, or lending or borrowing money, or any other transaction that has a bearing on the profits, income, losses or assets of the enterprise.

“Associated enterprise” means, in relation to another enterprise, an enterprise that participates, directly or indirectly, in the management, control or capital of the other enterprise. The IT Act also sets out a certain shareholding participation threshold under which two or more enterprises are deemed to be associated with each other.

Related Link Icon-IBHow to Establish an NGO in India

Methods for calculating arm’s length price

The rules state that the arm’s length price must be established using five specific transfer pricing methods. These methods – which largely mirror those outlined in the OECD guidance – include comparable uncontrolled price, resale price, cost plus, profit split, and transactional net margin methods. Additionally, the CBDT prescribes other appropriate methods to establish the arm’s length price so long as they are in conformity with the OECD guidelines.

Transfer pricing documentation and penalties

An enterprise entering into an international transaction with an associate enterprise must maintain transfer pricing documentation, the requirements of which are set out in Section 92D of the IT Act and Rule 10D of the Income Tax Rules. The rules require enterprises to submit details of international transactions in Form 3CEB, which is appended to the tax return. Any supplementary documentation must be produced before the tax authority upon request.

Transfer pricing documentation is pivotal in defending the enterprise’s own transfer pricing treatment and avoiding transfer pricing penalties. A penalty is applicable where the enterprise has failed to file Form 3CEB, or where the enterprise fails to submit all necessary details of international transactions and associated enterprises, and where submitted, the details provide an inaccurate account of particulars of income.

Transfer pricing audit, adjustments and appeal

In India, the principal approach in selecting cases for transfer pricing audit is “risk-based”, which is carried out through the Computer Aided Selection System (electronic software). CASS plays an important role in selecting cases for transfer pricing audit as large taxpayers (with annual income of more than INR 10 lakhs, approximately US $15,750) submit electronic returns. Paper returns, however, escape such an extensive selection process.

Taxpayers who have recorded international transactions worth more than INR 15 crores (approximately US $2.4 mil) in a given year are subject to mandatory scrutiny. In 2014, a government-appointed Tax Administration Reform Commission recommended doing away with mandatory scrutiny for lack of adequate infrastructure, hinting that the CBDT fails to pursue other “appropriate” cases in its pursuit for cases under mandatory scrutiny.

The tax authority is entitled to make transfer pricing adjustments to the enterprise’s total income in calculating the arm’s length price. The tax adjustment is subject to penalties, which is calculated based on the increase in the total taxable income or a decrease in the amount of allowances following such an adjustment.

Related Link Icon-IBNew Indian e-Visa Scheme Makes it Easier for “Casual Business” Visits

An enterprise disputing the tax authority’s adjustment may file an appeal against assessment orders according to the provisions set out under Sections 246 to 262 of Chapter XX of the IT Act. An appeal first lies with the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT Appeals), and must be made within 30 days from the date of assessment order. Alternatively, Section 144C of the IT Act provides for an optional Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) to speedily adjudicate disputes relating to international transactions, including transfer pricing.

An appeal further lies with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal within 60 days from the date of the order of the CIT Appeals or the DRP. Thereafter, appeal lies with the respective High Court and finally with the Supreme Court. The limitation period prescribed for appeals is fixed and may only be varied at the discretion of the adjudicating authority and subject to presentation of satisfactory evidence justifying the delay.

Advance pricing agreements

In 2012, the Government introduced an advance pricing agreement (APA) regime with a view to reducing transfer pricing litigation. An APA is an agreement between the tax authority and the taxpayer to determine, in advance, the arm’s length price in relation to an international transaction. Under Section 92CC of the IT Act, the CBDT is empowered to enter into an advance pricing agreement with any person, determining the arm’s length price or specifying the manner in which the arm’s length price is to be determined, in relation to an international transaction to be entered into by that person.

An APA can be of three kinds: unilateral, and bilateral or multilateral APAs involving foreign tax authorities. Once entered, an APA is usually binding and valid for five years, but may be declared void on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation of facts. Primarily, an APA is entered into with the following four objectives:

  • Increases tax certainty, as arm’s length pricing is pre-determined;
  • Avoids double-taxation, as a bilateral or multilateral APA binds a foreign tax authority;
  • Reduces compliance costs, as audit risks are eliminated; and
  • Easy transfer pricing documentation.

To strengthen the administrative set up of APA to expedite disposal of applications, Budget 2014 introduced a “Roll Back” provision in the APA scheme, which implies that an APA entered for future transactions may be applied to international transactions undertaken in the previous four years in specified circumstances.

Mutual agreement procedure

In addition to APAs, countries usually agree a mutual agreement procedure (MAP) at the time of concluding double tax avoidance agreements (DTAAs). The procedure is usually contained in Article 25 of the DTAA, which requires two contracting countries to endeavour to amicably resolve tax disputes (by way of arbitration) that arise from the DTAA. As part of its work on base erosion and profit shifting (analysis to be included in part 2 of this article), the OECD is seeking to set out a uniform framework on MAP for countries to apply. However, at the recently concluded meeting of the Group of Twenty (G-20) nations in Australia, India’s representation expressed reservations on introducing a mandatory arbitration clause in tax treaties.

Related Link Icon-IBA Guide to India’s Transfer Pricing Law, Part 2: Should BEPS be on India’s Radar?

About Us

Asia Briefing Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please email or visit

Stay up to date with the latest business and investment trends in Asia by subscribing to our complimentary update service featuring news, commentary and regulatory insight.


Related Reading-IB

IB Nov issue smallEstablishing Your Sourcing Platform in India
In this issue of India Briefing, we highlight the advantages India possesses as a sourcing option and explore the choices available to foreign companies seeking to create a sourcing presence here. In addition, we examine the relevant procurement, procedural and tax duty concerns involved in sourcing from India, and conclude by investigating the importance of supplier due diligence – a process that, if not conducted correctly, can often prove the undoing of a sourcing venture.

Taking Advantage of India’s FDI Reforms
In this edition of India Briefing Magazine, we explore important amendments to India’s foreign investment policy and outline various options for business establishment, including the creation of wholly owned subsidiaries in sectors that permit 100 percent foreign direct investment. We additionally explore several taxes that apply to wholly owned subsidiary companies, and provide an outlook for what investors can expect to see in India this year.

An Introduction to Audit in India In this issue of India Briefing, we examine how India’s accounting standards differ from the globally accepted IFRS and IAS protocols, and outline the standard steps and procedures an Indian auditor will go through during the audit process and explain pre-audit preparations that can be carried out to make the process easier to follow and understand for foreign executives.

How to Establish an NGO in India

Posted on by

By Grace Tate

The Indian government has long been wary of foreign political interference through the operation and funding of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). As a result, the current legislation affords regulatory discretion to the government by prohibiting foreign funding for political organizations and imposes onerous reporting requirements for all NGOs. Recent intelligence reports have sparked fears that these laws are undergoing government reform to further restrict NGO operation in India.

Continue reading…

Sourcing and Procurement from India: Establishing an Office on the Ground

Posted on by

DELHI – For businesses wanting direct control over their sourcing operation in India, establishing a local presence is an integral step. Although creating an office on the ground inevitably necessitates a greater financial and legal burden for the company in question, it is an effective means of ensuring higher performance levels from a sourcing platform.

First of all, the company must decide on what sort of entity they want to establish, from which they will be able to manage their sourcing operation in India by varying degrees of control. In this excerpt from our latest India Briefing magazine, we compare the two most relevant options.

Liaison Office

By far the cheapest and simplest to establish of the two, liaison offices are typically used by foreign companies as a communication channel with their sourcing operation in India. Its functions are described in this graph:

The parent company of an LO must have:

• A three-year record of profitable operations;
• A net worth of at least US$50,000.

They must then:

• First be approved by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and register with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days of beginning their operations in India;
• Once approved, they can operate for a maximum of three years, and then request renewal.

Related Link Icon-IBAn Introduction to Sourcing from India, Part 1: India’s Sourcing Edge

Whilst an LO is a useful tool for monitoring a sourcing operation in India, and can be established with comparatively minimal expense and legal pressure, its functions and capabilities are notably finite. They cannot undertake any commercial or industrial activities and consequently are unable to manage exports or earn an income in India. The upshot of this condition, however, is that liaison offices are not liable for taxation in India.

For these reasons, a company with an LO would still be taking an ‘indirect’ route to source from India. The principal role of a liaison office is therefore to ensure that suppliers are performing adequately. If a greater level of control is desired, however, a branch office should be selected.

Branch Office

The powers of a branch office are far greater than those of an LO. Most importantly, a BO is able to manage its exports itself. As well as the functions of a liaison office, a BO can best be described as follows:

The parent company of a BO must have:

• A five-year record of profitable operations;
• A net worth of at least US$100,000.

Additionally, a company must:

• Provide details of its operating history, interests in India, and reasons for wanting to open a BO.

Related Link Icon-IBAn Introduction to Sourcing from India, Part 2: Exporting from India

Like an LO, a BO must have prior approval from the RBI before it is established. Once approved, it can then register with the tax authorities, obtain a permanent account number, and be issued visas for its staff.

The only significant restriction placed on a BO is its inability to directly engage in the manufacturing process. This, however, can be bypassed if the office is established in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), and in a sector that allows 100 percent FDI. Because a BO has powers to export products from India, it is considered a ‘direct’ means of managing a sourcing operation. It is therefore the best option for a company wishing to exercise a high level of control over their sourcing platform.


IB Nov issue smallThis article is an excerpt from the November issue of India Briefing Magazine, titled “Establishing Your Sourcing Platform in India“. In this issue, we highlight the advantages India possesses as a sourcing option and explore the choices available to foreign companies seeking to create a sourcing presence here. In addition, we examine the relevant procurement, procedural and tax duty concerns involved in sourcing from India, and conclude by investigating the importance of supplier due diligence – a process that, if not conducted correctly, can often prove the undoing of a sourcing venture.”Establishing Your Sourcing Platform in India” is out now and available as a complimentary download in the Asia Briefing Bookstore.

Related Reading-IB
 Taking Advantage of India’s FDI Reforms
In this edition of India Briefing Magazine, we explore important amendments to India’s foreign investment policy and outline various options for business establishment, including the creation of wholly owned subsidiaries in sectors that permit 100 percent foreign direct investment. We additionally explore several taxes that apply to wholly owned subsidiary companies, and provide an outlook for what investors can expect to see in India this year.

Passage to India: Selling to India’s Consumer Market
In this issue of India Briefing Magazine, we outline the fundamentals of India’s import policies and procedures, as well as provide an introduction to the essentials of engaging in direct and indirect export, acquiring an Indian company, selling to the government and establishing a local presence in the form of a liaison office, branch office, or wholly owned subsidiary. We conclude by taking a closer look at the strategic potential of joint ventures and the advantages they can provide companies at all stages of market entry and expansion.

Trading with India
In this issue of India Briefing, we focus on the dynamics driving India as a global trading hub. Within the magazine, you will find tips for buying and selling in India from overseas, as well as how to set up a trading company in the country.

New Indian e-Visa Scheme Makes it Easier for “Casual Business” Visits

Posted on by

DELHI – Last week, India loosened its electronic visa policies for visitors from 43 nations including Australia, Brazil, Germany, and the U.S.  Although the changes are chiefly aimed at boosting international tourist visits to the country, the new e-visa can also be used for a “casual business” visit and should encourage more businesses to travel to the country.

The new visa is part of an Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) Scheme which requires visitors to apply online at least four days before leaving for India.  The visitor can then print a copy of the authorization and take it directly to immigration authorities.

Continue reading…

Getting to Grips with India’s New Labor Laws

Posted on by

Photo: Aijaz Rahi/APDELHI – India has taken steps to reform its labor market in order to increase the size of its manufacturing sector and create more jobs. Most of these reforms have come after the inauguration of new Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

These changes are part of Modi’s goal to use labor-intensive manufacturing to employ its booming working age population. Currently India’s economy is notable for having a disproportionately large service sector for a country at its level of development. It is particularly noticeable because its rival China kicked off its economic growth through manufacturing.

Continue reading…

A Guide to India’s Special Economic Zones

Posted on by

By Samuel Wrest

India’s special economic zones (SEZs) are certain localities which offer tax and other incentives to their resident businesses. Although India’s SEZs are relatively new, they now form a significant part of its appeal as both a sourcing and manufacturing destination. In this article, we examine how these zones function and highlight some of the key information relevant for companies considering setting up in an Indian SEZ.

Continue reading…

Can India’s Newly Drafted Road Safety Laws Help Boost its Economy?

Posted on by

Op-Ed Commentary: Benedict Lynn

Since his landslide election victory in May, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been attempting to eliminate the various obstacles that have thus far impeded India’s economic development. The new government’s emphasis has ostensibly been on the country’s underdeveloped infrastructure, and billions of dollars have accordingly been invested into its railways in an ambitious Chinese-style revival plan. India’s notoriously dangerous and congested roads, however, have until now eluded any significant parliamentary scrutiny.

On Saturday, the Modi administration released their draft bill on road safety laws. Widely thought to have been motivated by the death of senior BJP minister Gopinath Munde in a road accident in June, the bill proposes setting up an independent agency for road safety and vehicle regulation; a national authority that will have the power to recall vehicles which do not adhere to a required set of standards. Furthermore, a western-style penalty point system that includes severe fines and, in some cases, imprisonment, has also been proposed.

Continue reading…

Establishing a Liaison Office to Reach the Indian Market

Posted on by

DELHI – Establishing a liaison office is typically the first exploratory step foreign companies take towards selling to the Indian market. Liaison offices are permitted to facilitate and promote the parent company’s business activities and act as a communications channel between the foreign parent company and Indian companies and consumers. While unable to engage in commercial, trading, or industrial activities, liaison offices can promote imports/exports and establish market opportunities for the parent company.

A liaison office can be an especially effective option when coupled with either direct or indirect export activities. The Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) governs the application and approval process for the establishment of a liaison or branch office. Under the Act, foreign enterprises must receive specific approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to operate a liaison office in the country. Applications are to be submitted through Form FNC (Application for Establishment of Branch/Liaison Office in India).

Continue reading…

Asia Briefing Bookstore Catalogue 2013 Dezan Shira & Associates
Scroll to top